From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jul 30 23: 1:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from pop3-3.enteract.com (pop3-3.enteract.com [207.229.143.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA4CF15200 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 23:01:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Received: (qmail 79239 invoked from network); 31 Jul 1999 05:59:03 -0000 Received: from shell-1.enteract.com (dscheidt@207.229.143.40) by pop3-3.enteract.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 1999 05:59:03 -0000 Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 00:59:03 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt To: Alex Zepeda Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hey kernel hackers, this is worth a read. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > http://features.linuxtoday.com/stories/8191.html > > > > A story on upcoming plans for the Linux 2.4 kernel. Since they're > > going after a lot of the same performance goals we are, it's worth a > > read. > > It seems to me that a lot of the features mentioned are already in > -CURRENT and some in -STABLE. Hmm. I rather liked this paragraph: There are some suprising things missing there. No ISA PnP, just now unifiying read and write buffer caches. There are also things were they appear to be ahead of FreeBSD, like SMP. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message