Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 21:59:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 212828] net/intel-em-kmod: new port for Intel em driver version 7.6.2 Message-ID: <bug-212828-13-wGQmO06cXX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-212828-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-212828-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212828 Sergey Kozlov <kozlov.sergey.404@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kozlov.sergey.404@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Sergey Kozlov <kozlov.sergey.404@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 175290 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D175290&action= =3Dedit slave port example Hi all, I'm the author of net/intel-ixl-kmod and I work for Intel. The ixl port was made to be a master one, that means to serve as a base for other driver ports' (slaves). Here's the example of how this port would look like being a slave to net/intel-ixl-kmod. The patch includes a small change= to the ixl port as well to be able to override the MAINTAINER. This approach has some advantages: - You don't have to repeat a lot of code - If anything big changes to all the drivers - it will be changed in the ma= ster port and automatically propagated to others. If you would consider this - just substitute your patch with mine. Regards, Sergey --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-212828-13-wGQmO06cXX>