Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 11:29:42 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227450] [patch] Should not all packets processed by gif_output be deleted, when an running instance of if_gif(4) is member of an instance of if_bridge(4)? Message-ID: <bug-227450-7501-MXL8wuMQsi@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-227450-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-227450-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227450 --- Comment #1 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=8a0308722372a3ac6a94967ae4fe3123842309e2 commit 8a0308722372a3ac6a94967ae4fe3123842309e2 Author: Marius Strobl <marius@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2023-07-23 16:58:42 +0000 Commit: Marius Strobl <marius@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2023-07-26 11:14:22 +0000 gif(4): Assert that gif_output() isn't called for EtherIP With the current implementation of if_bridge(4), bridge_enqueue() calls gif_transmit() only. Ensure it stays that way so that the expectations in both drivers are either met or changed accordingly. PR: 227450 sys/net/if_gif.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-227450-7501-MXL8wuMQsi>