From owner-cvs-all Sat Apr 15 15: 1:38 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net (granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD37337B78C; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:01:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca7-28.ix.netcom.com [209.109.235.28]) by granger.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA31807; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 18:00:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id PAA19389; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:00:09 -0700 (PDT) To: Warner Losh Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , Brian Somers , "David E. O'Brien" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/tcsh - Imported sources References: <1210.955826595@critter.freebsd.dk> <200004152113.PAA28692@harmony.village.org> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 15 Apr 2000 15:00:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: Warner Losh's message of "Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:13:13 -0600" Message-ID: Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * From: Warner Losh * The first issue was unclear. People generally argued against this due * to size, but said they'd be happy enough with a port of the older * csh. This was especially true amoung the embedded folks that posted. I wouldn't say "people generally" argued against" it. Peter Wemm, myself and a lot of other committers supported it, saying that tcsh is just a newer and maintained version of our old csh. I do remember people setting up strawman arguments about embedded systems just to be knocked down by the embedded folks themselves. :> Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message