From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 29 6:43:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from imo-m03.mx.aol.com (imo-m03.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC9D37B419 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 06:43:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from TD790@aol.com by imo-m03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.26.) id n.c1.1ae80b1a (3313); Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:43:07 -0500 (EST) From: TD790@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:43:06 EST Subject: Re: OT: PSs, was: 64-bit PCI mobos To: burnscharlesn@hotmail.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In a message dated 1/29/02 4:04:55 AM Eastern Standard Time, burnscharlesn@hotmail.com writes: > You did not test the 180W PSs to see if they could output 180W cleanly, > because no power supply of any brand or quality can output its exact power > rating. That would require 100% efficiency and 100% power stability. Thus, > your absolute fact is not. I have found that this tends to be far more > common among those who use AOL. > I dont think I said they put out exactly 180..in fact im sure i didnt. Even though TYAN admits to the problem, you desparately continue to try to make a point that can't be made. Please get a clue. DB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message