From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Feb 26 2:28:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBA137B400 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 02:28:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from blossom.cjclark.org ([12.234.91.48]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020226102816.UJZN2626.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@blossom.cjclark.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 10:28:16 +0000 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by blossom.cjclark.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1QASGA56130; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 02:28:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 02:28:16 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Terry Lambert Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" , "Jeremy C. Reed" , FreeBSD Chat Subject: Re: blocked mail Message-ID: <20020226022816.I52727@blossom.cjclark.org> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <3C7AC400.B8F3E9FC@mindspring.com> <20020225174520.L47910@over-yonder.net> <3C7AEC08.223E422C@mindspring.com> <20020225224754.G52727@blossom.cjclark.org> <3C7B5076.435E3B8@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3C7B5076.435E3B8@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 01:08:06AM -0800 X-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 01:08:06AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > "Crist J. Clark" wrote: > > > Nevertheless, it's a common rule, and it used to be the > > > default (it's called relay for MX) until the latest > > > sendmail import; did you read Greg Shapiro's announcement > > > on the changes? > > > > Pretty sure relay_based_on_MX has nothing to do with the sender, the > > MAIL FROM. It checks the _recipient's,_ the RCPT TO, domain's MX > > points to itself. There is no conflict if outgoing and incoming (which > > is the one MX records point at) are not the same. > > I can't remember the "README" and M4 source code right now, > but there is an option to permit a MAIL FROM check to make > sure that the EHLO host (peername) is an MX for the from > domain. relay_local_from is what you are talking about (which was never in the freebsd.mc). -- Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu | cjclark@jhu.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message