From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Sep  2 20:47:53 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA29218
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 2 Sep 1996 20:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA29211
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 1996 20:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA06864; Mon, 2 Sep 1996 20:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth)
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Sep 1996 22:11:48 CDT."
             <v02140b01ae5151511e59@[208.2.87.4]> 
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 1996 20:47:40 -0700
Message-ID: <6861.841722460@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> If I have ctm release 100, and it works, I would verfify that 101 is OK.
> From 101, I might verify 102, etc.
> 
> However, 102 might NOT build from 100 because it depends on the
> installation of something in 101.  :-(

Then the thing that was depended on should have been added to the
bootstrap target between 101 and 102, as is our general policy.  We'd
probably also have to get a little more anal about insisting that
folks try the bootstrap target before crying wolf, but it should (in
theory, of course) work.

					Jordan