From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Apr 30 19:07:09 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA02859
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 19:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA02852
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 19:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	  by palmer.demon.co.uk (sendmail/PALMER-1) with ESMTP id DAA17255
	  for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 1 May 1996 03:06:42 +0100 (BST)
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Warnings in LINT
Date: Wed, 01 May 1996 03:06:42 +0100
Message-ID: <17253.830916402@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


What is the ``correct'' way to silence these warnings:

../../gnu/isdn/iitel.c:1: warning: `_itelid' defined but not used
../../gnu/isdn/isdn_ioctl.h:1: warning: `_isdn_ioctl_id' defined but not used

My initial thought is to hide them with a KERN_RCS ifdef (inspired by
libc), but is that the right thing to do? Any other ideas?

Gary
--
Gary Palmer                                            FreeBSD Core Team Member
FreeBSD - Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info.