From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 31 11:00:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2EB106566C for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DA08FC1B for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0VB0WNH066043 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:00:32 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0VB0WGl066042; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:00:32 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:00:32 GMT Message-Id: <201201311100.q0VB0WGl066042@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: igor Cc: Subject: Re: kern/156567: [kqueue] [patch] Add EV_CLEAR to AIO events in kqueue X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: igor List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:00:33 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/156567; it has been noted by GNATS. From: igor To: Cc: , Subject: Re: kern/156567: [kqueue] [patch] Add =?UTF-8?Q?EV=5FCLEAR=20to?= =?UTF-8?Q?=20AIO=20events=20in=20kqueue?= Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:52:10 +0400 --=_3349fc38fa29cf5858e92f7cc8080a49 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello David, The only thing I changed is the value of the flag, this is the only meaning of the patch. I do not know who decided to place the value there. On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:04:06 +0800, David Xu wrote: > On 2012/1/31 4:47, igor wrote: > >> Dear all, What can I do to get my patch finally applied or rejected (hope not :) ? My PR is not even assigned to anyone. Should I do my best to become a committer (how? :-) ? The solution I propose finally allows to use kqueue with aio in multi-threaded applications. The only reason I created it is because I wanted to use it for myself and it worked flawlessly. Please, anyone? > > It is better to allocate a member field from struct sigevent for kevent > flags, we have spare fields available there, please check the union > _sigev_un. > > Regards, > David Xu -- Igor Soumenkov --=_3349fc38fa29cf5858e92f7cc8080a49 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

Hello David,

The only thing I changed is the value of the flag, this is the only mean= ing of the patch. I do not know who decided to place the value there.

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:04:06 +0800, David Xu wrote:

On 2012/1/31 4:47, igor wrote:
Dear all, What can I do to get my pat= ch finally applied or rejected (hope not :) ? My PR is not even assigned to= anyone. Should I do my best to become a committer (how? :-) ? The solution= I propose finally allows to use kqueue with aio in multi-threaded applicat= ions. The only reason I created it is because I wanted to use it for myself= and it worked flawlessly. Please, anyone?
It is better to allocate a member field from struct sigevent for keven=
 t
 flags, we have spare fields available there, please check the union
 _sigev_un.
 
 Regards,
 David Xu

 

--=20
 Igor Soumenkov
--=_3349fc38fa29cf5858e92f7cc8080a49--