From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Aug 23 11:52: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3109737B423 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:52:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16394; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:51:47 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000823125026.05818490@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:51:43 -0600 To: Roland Jesse , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: ddd (was: Gimme FreeBSD anyday!) In-Reply-To: <0vpun0uoul.fsf_-_@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> References: <200008151718.e7FHIbb13082@mail.hiwaay.net> <20000821144137.D13975@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20000821160518.B20036@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <20000821180045.B258@parish> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I tried it recently, and it segfaulted repeatedly during routine operations. I gave up and went back to my own macros for gdb. I really wish I could avoid using GPLed tools! It is a shame that there appears to be no other source level debugger for FreeBSD. --Brett At 06:46 AM 8/23/2000, Roland Jesse wrote: >Mark Ovens writes: > >> Or eminently more sensible is to install ddd(1) > >Whis is generally a good idea. But does it still puke on dynamically >linked libraries? I was once trying to debug a dynamically linked >binary and ddd simply ignored my $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and complained that >it cannot find a lib...so. > > Roland > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message