From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 19:47:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C1216A420 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:47:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from hex.athame.co.uk (salama58.adsl.netsonic.fi [81.17.207.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA90C43D55 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:47:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from localhost.athame.co.uk ([127.0.0.1] helo=hex.athame.co.uk) by hex.athame.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EyaJg-000K1C-H9; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:47:00 +0200 Received: from localhost (adridg@localhost) by hex.athame.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id k0GJkwnD076948; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:46:59 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) X-Authentication-Warning: hex.athame.co.uk: adridg owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:46:58 +0200 (EET) From: Adriaan de Groot X-X-Sender: adridg@hex.athame.co.uk To: Vivek Khera In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060116214414.P76671@hex.athame.co.uk> References: <20060110235259.N1006@ganymede.hub.org> <4294ECA5-C8B6-484A-94BA-5EBC61498280@khera.org> <20060114012450.U28752@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: first time with a 64bit CPU ... kernel config ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:47:07 -0000 On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Vivek Khera wrote: > On Jan 14, 2006, at 12:26 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> Just curious, but is there anything i want to add to make.conf? My i386 >> boxes, I have: >> >> CFLAGS= -O -mpentium -pipe -g -DKVA_PAGES=512 >> COPTFLAGS= -O -mpentium -pipe -DKVA_PAGES=512 > > nope. if anything, you can set CPUTYPE=nacona for your Intel EM64T box, but > I don't see any difference than leaving it blank. Probably because the CPU is called a Nocona by Intel; presumably the CPUTYPE flag would also want it spelled correctly. That said, there used to be no point in setting CPUTYPE because there's just one amd64 instruction set and optimization profile that gcc knows about - I'm not sure if that is still the case.