From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jul 13  9:32:45 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from imo-r09.mx.aol.com (imo-r09.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.105])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA8A37B403
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from Bsdguru@aol.com)
Received: from Bsdguru@aol.com
	by imo-r09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31.7.) id x.9a.16f79f8c (4241);
	Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:32:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bsdguru@aol.com
Message-ID: <9a.16f79f8c.28807ca5@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:32:37 EDT
Subject: Re: Intel ISP1100 or similar 1U experience with 4.3 stable
To: dg@root.com, hackers@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 139
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In a message dated 07/12/2001 6:44:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dg@root.com 
writes:

> The cooling in the 2U solution is better than the 1U...

Which is pretty much all I was recommending. Im not sure why everyone is 
getting so  hot under the collar. You agree with me, yet you are arguing 
anyway. 

"If you have the space, 2U is better". Why is that statement so irritating to 
you. Its a fact. you agree with it. So what is the problem?

B

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message