From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Oct 18 16:35:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4113E3DB95 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from system.jails.se (system.jails.se [52.16.239.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 716BE84FF1 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from lune.pean.org (213-67-100-148-no110.tbcn.telia.com [213.67.100.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A84BD11FDDC; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:35:33 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.0 \(3445.1.7\)) Subject: Re: 802.1X authenticator for FreeBSD From: =?utf-8?Q?Peter_Ankerst=C3=A5l?= In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:35:32 +0200 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2D461E1D-895F-4D31-9834-A40DEF02F121@pean.org> References: To: Chris Ross X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.1.7) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:35:43 -0000 > On 17 Oct 2017, at 22:27, Chris Ross wrote: >=20 >=20 > wpa_supplicant is the client we use at work, on Linux systems. But, = it=E2=80=99s also the tool described in the FreeBSD wireless = configuration pages, so I know it can be used there. >=20 > I haven=E2=80=99t tried FreeBSD with wired 802.1x myself, but just a = thought I had. >=20 > - Chris >=20 Its my understanding that wpa_supplicant is actually a working client in = FreeBSD. But I=E2=80=99m looking for the server side of this.=20 It would be just fine if it worked just like hostapd (control access of = one nic) and dont have any control over switchports or whatever. Another = nice way of doing it would be to have some sort of integration with = authpf or pf itself.=