From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 20:05:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777EC16A69B for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13B743D76 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:04:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdYRt-000O7f-3U; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:04:54 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:04:54 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Kep Woof , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org Thread-Index: AcZzo9ZeFLrgFd+XEdqxMAAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <9c8168780605090252l241bdc42h99f5b12f5b38f324@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:05:02 -0000 On 9/5/06 10:52, "Kep Woof" wrote: > Hi, > > I guess this is the wrong list, but I just looked at freebsd.org and > saw the new logo. I really think it looks terrible. Everyone that > I've spoken to agrees. It looks like some kind of sextoy/spacehopper, > and not becomming to the enterprise os we know and love. Maybe it was > the best from the competition you had, but I don't think it's good > enough. Is there somewhere this was discussed? The new logo already > looks last year. Is there a plan to redesign it each year as design > trends come and go? If you compare it to the debian, IBM, BMW, > greenpeace, or google logos, the design relates in some way to the > subject. I don't see that happening here. > > Sorry if this is too late, or an unpopular opinion, or in the wrong > place, but I just wondered if anyone thinks the new logo is good, and > how long it's expected to last. > > Interested to hear what people think, I think you're trolling. Well done anyway. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere