From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 09:16:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB5C37B401 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d3-hrz.uni-duisburg.de (d3-hrz.uni-duisburg.de [134.91.1.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D2943F85 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:16:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark.weinem@uni-duisburg.de) Received: from me (athome15.uni-duisburg.de [134.91.17.25]) by d3-hrz.uni-duisburg.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id h38GGa4K029137 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 18:16:37 +0200 (METDST) Received: (nullmailer pid 28702 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 08 Apr 2003 00:08:19 -0000 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 02:08:19 +0200 From: Mark Weinem To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030408000819.GC52845@pandora.plagegeister.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200304062023.37473.fallenbr@uol.com.br> <200304062141.33136.taxman@acd.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200304062141.33136.taxman@acd.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.21 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Subject: Re: From 4.7 to 4.8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 16:16:46 -0000 On Sun, 06 Apr 2003, taxman wrote: > > > - Using the binary upgrade option of sysinstall(8). > > as far as I understand it, it's the worst of the three options. Back up and > reinstall is the most reliable. I've done many many source upgrades, and > never had serious problems that trying again didn't fix. I don't see why binary upgrading should be worst. Never had serious problems with it. Ciao, Mark