From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 11 14:00:58 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EFE36B;
 Sun, 11 Aug 2013 14:00:58 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from mack@macktronics.com)
Received: from borg.macktronics.com (borg.macktronics.com [209.181.253.68])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04B2526BF;
 Sun, 11 Aug 2013 14:00:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from olive.macktronics.com (olive.macktronics.com [209.181.253.67])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by borg.macktronics.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6005AFA;
 Sun, 11 Aug 2013 09:00:56 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 09:00:56 -0500 (CDT)
From: Dan Mack <mack@macktronics.com>
To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: nanobsd-built system doesn't have SVN revision in "uname" (and
 it looks like regression)
In-Reply-To: <20130811135746.GI2432@glenbarber.us>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308110900220.46632@olive.macktronics.com>
References: <37152758.20130810151846@serebryakov.spb.ru>
 <602958881.20130810180203@serebryakov.spb.ru>
 <CAJ-Vmo=nwiC-598+aaA4FFQCscjyox4PwTiDDMXb6SGFGGx3Ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130810141324.GD2432@glenbarber.us>
 <529930061.20130810191339@serebryakov.spb.ru>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308101235030.26745@olive.macktronics.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308101300350.2513@olive.macktronics.com>
 <20130810181152.GE2432@glenbarber.us> <20130810182459.GF2432@glenbarber.us>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308110824240.3361@olive.macktronics.com>
 <20130811135746.GI2432@glenbarber.us>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org,
 freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 14:00:58 -0000

Yeah, I agree with avoiding the 'cd' as well.  I'll give it a try shortly.

Dan

On Sun, 11 Aug 2013, Glen Barber wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 08:25:42AM -0500, Dan Mack wrote:
>>
>> There's still one problem left ... the svnliteversion test fails
>> because you are not in the correct directory. This is the patch that
>> worked for me ...
>>
>
> Yep, you are correct.  Although, rather than cd(1) to the SYSDIR
> directory, I think using realpath(1) is better, because that will use
> the full path to the newvers.sh script.
>
> Please try r254217, which should *finally* do the right thing.
>
> Glen
>
>


dan
--
Dan Mack