From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 16 22:56:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E239E37B416 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 22:56:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2H6twUD050251; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 07:55:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Steve Kargl Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Removing CSRG libm? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 16 Mar 2002 18:58:44 PST." <20020316185844.A55727@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 07:55:58 +0100 Message-ID: <50250.1016348158@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20020316185844.A55727@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Steve Kargl wr ites: >A long time ago I submitted PR misc/17848 which >removes CSRG libm sources. The audit trail shows >some commentary, but AFAICT nothing much has been >done based on that commentary. With the upcoming >release of of 5.0, I think we should consider the >removal od CSRG libm and the repo copying of msun >to libm; otherwise we'll drag CSRG libm around >until 6.0. Good idea. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message