From owner-freebsd-security Fri Sep 27 5:55:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8CD37B401 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 05:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tagish.taiga.ca (tagish.taiga.ca [204.209.164.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D55043E3B for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 05:55:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from campbell@tagish.taiga.ca) Received: (from campbell@localhost) by tagish.taiga.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id GAA18796; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 06:54:08 -0600 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 06:54:08 -0600 From: Duncan Campbell Message-Id: <200209271254.GAA18796@tagish.taiga.ca> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, mailman@crypton.pl Subject: Re: kern.ps_showallprocs and procfs Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I tend to regard procfs as something of a debugging tool. If you limit it as is probably necessary to do what you suggest, its value as a tool becomes degraded. Duihb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message