From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Wed Dec 14 17:49:30 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759A8C80783
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:49:30 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6535981A
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:49:30 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uBEHnUKU020512
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:49:30 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 215305] lang/clang-devel: out of date and misleading
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:49:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: mazhe@alkumuna.eu
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: brooks@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform
 op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
 flagtypes.name
Message-ID: <bug-215305-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:49:30 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215305

            Bug ID: 215305
           Summary: lang/clang-devel: out of date and misleading
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: brooks@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: mazhe@alkumuna.eu
          Assignee: brooks@FreeBSD.org
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(brooks@FreeBSD.org)

Hi,

For some times, there were lang/clang[...] ports that were (supposedly)
metaports accompagning the devel/llvm[...] ports for (I guess?) the purpose=
 of
creating a package that would provide clang.

For a while however the llvm port had the CLANG option enabled and especial=
ly
the lang/clang-devel port stagnated and is now very misleading, dating from=
 a
pre-3.8 release (when llvm-devel is around 4.0).

Should not this port be removed?

It seems no other port depends on it:

  /usr/ports# find . -name Makefile | grep clang-devel
  ./lang/clang-devel/Makefile

Thanks

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=