From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 20 00:25:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55E0106566B; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993B48FC16; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.local ([192.168.254.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1K0P4Lu011485; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:25:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <499DF860.8020903@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:25:04 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <200902192218.n1JMI1HF009245@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200902192218.n1JMI1HF009245@svn.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r188832 - head/sys/nfsclient X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:25:08 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > Author: jhb > Date: Thu Feb 19 22:18:00 2009 > New Revision: 188832 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/188832 > > Log: > When fetching attributes for a file for NFSv3 mounts, do not perform an > opportunistic ACCESS RPC to populate both the access and attribute caches > of the file and instead always use a GETATTR RPC. On many modern NFS > servers, an ACCESS RPC is much more expensive to service than a GETATTR > RPC. > Not too long ago, this was a very useful and important optimization. Can you say which servers this applies to? Could it have been made an option instead of outright deleted? Scott