Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:57:52 -0400 From: Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> To: Tim Judd <tajudd@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: source for sysinstall Message-ID: <4ad871310905030157ia04487fof5ea699bbf2d861f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ade45ae90905030156i3c299a88s8b21d9698c8e5d1a@mail.gmail.com> References: <49FD4EE8.3000209@a1poweruser.com> <4ad871310905030146n2690c762pba1baf0c47cdaf66@mail.gmail.com> <ade45ae90905030156i3c299a88s8b21d9698c8e5d1a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Tim Judd <tajudd@gmail.com> wrote: > Shouldn't we give the cvs URI instead of the svn? Isn't cvs the "norm" > whereas svn may be on it's way out? I could totally be in left field about > that though. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/sysinstall/ > I'm not aware of SVN being "on it's way out." Either way, either source could have been located with a little Google effort. -- Glen Barber
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ad871310905030157ia04487fof5ea699bbf2d861f>