Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:25:24 -0800
From:      Neel Natu <neelnatu@gmail.com>
To:        Susan Stanziano <susan.stanziano@xinuos.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: vmrun.sh error
Message-ID:  <CAFgRE9FSfP%2BhwEtbYjKezQVej1omsSuz_=2cOYchE-k2rxaMeg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <703912028.2258586.1418677985251.JavaMail.zimbra@xinuos.com>
References:  <2021452008.2147540.1418173300017.JavaMail.zimbra@xinuos.com> <207531434.2147650.1418173543122.JavaMail.zimbra@xinuos.com> <CAFgRE9EVTOsL6osv_E5cQK45hYh_58_-mvc8DUjNNy1ufg2fSg@mail.gmail.com> <703912028.2258586.1418677985251.JavaMail.zimbra@xinuos.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Susan,

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Susan Stanziano
<susan.stanziano@xinuos.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Neel,
>
> Thats a simple solution - I'll try it out.
>
> Are these patch fixes advertised in some way to the freebsd world?  just
> want to know if there's a place to check before reporting a problem.
>

This particular patch has not been committed if thats what you mean.

best
Neel

>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Neel Natu" <neelnatu@gmail.com>
> To: "Susan Stanziano" <susan.stanziano@xinuos.com>
> Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 9:15:19 PM
> Subject: Re: vmrun.sh error
>
>
> Hi Susan,
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Susan Stanziano
> <susan.stanziano@xinuos.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Craig suggested that I send this question to this mail alias:
>>
>> A couple of comments after creating VM's and using the vmrun.sh in
>> /usr/share/examples/bhyve/vmrun.sh:
>>
>> 1) I know you can't run two VM's at the same time with the same vmname,
>> but the error message from bhyveload is not informative to a new user:
>>
>> bhyveload: could not open "vmname"
>>
>> 2) The solution with the multiple use of a vmname seems to be that after
>> vmrun.sh issues the bhyvectl --destroy command, if there was a "sleep 1"
>> added, giving time for the destroy, the error message from bhyveload
>> wouldn't have to happen.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> I think the issue you are hinting at is that if /dev/vmm/testvm exists
> there isn't a reliable way to know whether or not 'testvm' is actually
> "running". There is no good way to fix this until we get to a single
> process model.
>
> However, you know for sure that if '/dev/vmm/testvm' does not exist
> then it is also not running.
>
> So, perhaps the following patch fixes your problem:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~neel/patches/vmrun_destroy.patch
>
> best
> Neel
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Susan Stanziano
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFgRE9FSfP%2BhwEtbYjKezQVej1omsSuz_=2cOYchE-k2rxaMeg>