From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 09:48:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D819716A403; Sun, 6 May 2007 09:48:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872FE13C487; Sun, 6 May 2007 09:48:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1HkdLr-000C5C-Aq; Sun, 06 May 2007 12:48:23 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Roman Divacky In-reply-to: <20070506093034.GA42976@freebsd.org> References: <20070506093034.GA42976@freebsd.org> Comments: In-reply-to Roman Divacky message dated "Sun, 06 May 2007 11:30:34 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 12:48:21 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 06 May 2007 11:27:22 +0000 Cc: Craig Rodrigues , Masanori OZAWA , FreeBSD Hackers , Daichi GOTO , Ed Schouten , Stanislav Sedov , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-19-20070504 release, it is now MPSAFE and transparent mode as default X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 09:48:26 -0000 > > Hi, > > So far I've tested it under -current, in my diskless env. where > > /etc & /compat/linux are unionfs'ed with a mfs, and so all seems OK. > > there's an XXX in the linuxulator code saying: > > XXX Untested vs. mount -o union; probably does the wrong thing. > > can you confirm that it works ok with unionfs from daichi? > sure, but what/how do you want me to test? danny