From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 23 8:38:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rz.uni-ulm.de (sirius-giga.rz.uni-ulm.de [134.60.241.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EF437B42C for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmx.de (lilith.wohnheim.uni-ulm.de [134.60.106.64]) by mail.rz.uni-ulm.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA13531 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:38:37 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <39A3EFFD.FB265955@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:38:37 +0200 From: Siegbert Baude X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Healthd: ISA or SMB? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I just installed healthd and wonder, if there will be any advantage of using the SMB interface instead of the ISA bus? System load, precision, something I donīt even know about? Are there any other useful things, which can be done with the SMB interface, which are worth compiling SMB support into the kernel? Thanks for your answers Siegbert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message