From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 23 18:07:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA13662 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 23 May 1996 18:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mistery.mcafee.com (jimd@mistery.mcafee.com [192.187.128.69]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA13651 for ; Thu, 23 May 1996 18:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jimd@localhost) by mistery.mcafee.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA13379; Thu, 23 May 1996 18:22:31 -0700 From: Jim Dennis Message-Id: <199605240122.SAA13379@mistery.mcafee.com> Subject: Re: SPAM - Can we make it stop! To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 18:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Cc: rich@oester.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, pinoy@thesphere.com In-Reply-To: <199605232205.PAA08459@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at May 23, 96 03:05:55 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > i think the following was sent to various freebsd list. it is a cute > > and clever spam (or perhaps testing to do spams). > I've gotten this spam as well; however, it was not sent to the list > (until now). Recheck your remailer headers; I think you've confused > it. > > p.s. to spam for the cause of stopping spamming? has it been done before? tis > > the only nobel spam, the one to end all spams. > Instead of fighting spam with spam, just don't buy anything from them, > ever, at any future time. Works for me. Eventually, they won't be > able to make any money from it, and they'll stop (worst case) or go > bankrupt (best case). > > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org However I highly recommend lodging your complaint with the spammer, the postmaster of the spammer's domain, and the postmaster, administrative and technical contacts for the the domain's ISP. Unfortunately these companies often don't go out of business, even if all the offended parties boycott them indefinitely. Their spamming is only one of many marketing efforts -- and they'll often never realize how many sales they've lost due to their behavior. Any sales they do make are indications of "success" and no marketer is going to say "our low sales are do to our piss-poor marketing strategy and blatant disregard for the values of our target audience" (well, some might -- but only to oust someone else out of a job). Jim Dennis, System Administrator, McAfee Associates