From owner-svn-src-stable@freebsd.org Fri Dec 30 07:52:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0556FC97FD0; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9AC1131F; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.1.121] (p4FE30FE4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.227.15.228]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3959E721E280C; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 08:52:02 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r310773 - in stable/11/sys: netinet netinet6 From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: <20161230061753.GD23243@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 08:52:00 +0100 Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <4498A998-FBB6-406D-8122-6A5BE7839E6F@freebsd.org> References: <20161229191838.GB23243@freefall.freebsd.org> <201612300117.uBU1HkpP008658@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <20161230061753.GD23243@freefall.freebsd.org> To: "Piotr P. Stefaniak" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:52:13 -0000 > On 30 Dec 2016, at 07:17, Piotr P. Stefaniak wrote: > > On 2016-12-29 17:17:46, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> -- Start of PGP signed section. >>> On 2016-12-29 18:09:39, Piotr P. Stefaniak wrote: >>> >2) the option -ta was added >>> >>> To clarify, what I mean is that the process that generates the sources >>> started using the -ta switch of indent(1), not that the feature was >>> recently implemented. >> >> Can you clarify what process these source files are generated by? If >> these are not the source files, but are being generated by some other >> thing then wouldn't we want the true sources and the generation process >> in the repsitory? I don't know. As far as I know, this kind of processing was happening right from the beginning of the integration of SCTP in FreeBSD. The script which runs is available at: https://github.com/sctplab/sctp-idata/blob/master/src/freebsd_prepare calling https://github.com/sctplab/sctp-idata/blob/master/src/s9indent Please note that this processing is happening for years. I added the -ta recently, since Piotr suggested it... The sources are also available at https://github.com/sctplab/sctp-idata/tree/master/src in the netinet and netinet6 directory. Please note that the upstream sources are ifdef'ed to allow * to be compiled in the FreeBSD kernel * to be compiled as a network kernel extension for Mac OS X * to be compiled as a loadable module for Windows (this worked in the past and the maintainer stopped) * to be compiled in a user land stack (with some glue code) being used in Firefox and Chrome browsers. Except for the -ta change, nothing has changed on my side, just ident was evolving and I wanted to keep the changes related to this isolated in a commit. That way I know that there is no upstream change in the source code. Best regards Michael > > I think that Michael would be the best person to answer that; I'm merely > the one who fixes and breaks indent(1). > >> If this is running indent(1) over source files to clean them up, >> then that is not "generating" sources per say, but instead cleaning >> them up with indent(1). > > That's what I mean. Sorry for the confusion.