From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 14:58:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13390106566C for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:58:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05118FC14 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:58:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=QkLoB5nR+HAFcruXhZo5dIIj3MwXTtJr/drmNpSraT4=; b=Ic94MrOQKz2F7aIrZYFo8AD/ITRTxGt5oCmF2yf2S/v12WLQo0ypNq67AW+M8wFOjdO5+lNGcrvhWeXHPoaPk8GOBi0yQZXNufTsJ0yxqam93n98Xxncz47GxrX/QIbR; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SUJCU-000Coa-HH for freebsd-jail@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 09:58:15 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1337093884-3288-3287/5/7; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:58:04 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org References: <4FB25E95.3070003@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:58:04 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.64 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Subject: Re: jail still broken on 9-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:58:17 -0000 On Tue, 15 May 2012 09:23:38 -0500, Christer Solskogen wrote: > I don't quite understand what you mean about that. Does it mean that you > have fixed it or that you will fix it sometime in the future? It's not scheduled to be pushed into 9-STABLE (MFC'd) for quite a while.