From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jul 13 9:40:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E1637B401 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:40:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg@root.com) Received: (from dg@localhost) by root.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f6DGTW060361; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:29:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:29:32 -0700 From: David Greenman To: Bsdguru@aol.com Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel ISP1100 or similar 1U experience with 4.3 stable Message-ID: <20010713092932.C49840@nexus.root.com> References: <9a.16f79f8c.28807ca5@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9a.16f79f8c.28807ca5@aol.com>; from Bsdguru@aol.com on Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 12:32:37PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >In a message dated 07/12/2001 6:44:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dg@root.com >writes: > >> The cooling in the 2U solution is better than the 1U... > >Which is pretty much all I was recommending. Im not sure why everyone is >getting so hot under the collar. You agree with me, yet you are arguing >anyway. > >"If you have the space, 2U is better". Why is that statement so irritating to >you. Its a fact. you agree with it. So what is the problem? The problem is that you said that 1U solutions are inherently unreliable, which is not true. -DG David Greenman Co-founder, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org President, TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com Pave the road of life with opportunities. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message