From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Nov 17  2:40:52 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from freenix.no (atreides.freenix.no [213.188.21.6])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4039437B479; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 02:40:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from shamz@localhost)
	by freenix.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA27893;
	Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:40:42 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from shamz)
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:40:42 +0100
From: Shaun Jurrens <shaun@shamz.net>
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Running inetd in jail panics system
Message-ID: <20001117114042.A1092@atreides.freenix.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE
X-Philosophy: If you can read this, you're too close.
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I have four jails running on a x86 UP box with 4.1.1 from 23Oct2000 and have
no problems whatsoever with inetd or any other daemons, that allow
themselves to be bound to an IP addr.  The manpage clearly tells you to do
this.  ftp'ing to the jails causes no panic.

I find the system ingenious, even if it's not entirely perfect yet.  It lets
me set up a large number of virtual test boxes for web development (as long
as one doesn't use postgres as a db :-( ) for that unruley species known as
"web developers".

-- 
Yours truly,

Shaun D. Jurrens
shaun@shamz.net
shamz@freenix.no



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message