From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 16:38:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81F916A4B3 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:38:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from transpacific.net (lincoln.transbay.net [209.133.53.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1171843F75 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:38:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sreese@codysbooks.com) Received: from [192.168.0.24] (stalwart.codysbooks.com [209.133.54.175]) by transpacific.net (8.11.6p2/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h8HNbLu23530; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:37:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Scott Reese To: Steve Kargl In-Reply-To: <20030917213730.GA49787@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <1063758471.632.17.camel@borges> <1063830098.639.60.camel@borges> <20030917213730.GA49787@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Cody's Books, Inc. Message-Id: <1063841783.27726.10.camel@borges> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:36:23 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Matthias Andree Subject: Re: Compiler Woes (was: Re: RAM Recommendations for a VIA Mainboard?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 23:38:14 -0000 On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 14:37, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 01:21:39PM -0700, Scott Reese wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:48, Matthias Andree wrote: > > > Scott Reese writes: > > > > > > > Though I'm not sure if RAM is my problem because I'm not getting Sig 11 > > > > errors. I keep getting extremely consistent internal compiler errors > > > > pretty much whenever I try to build *anything*. I've tried to > > > > buildkernel about 16 times today and each time I get stuck here (or very > > > > near here): > > > > > > > > > > An "internal compiler error" (ICE for short) can also be a compiler bug > > > if it happens in the same place consistently. I recall other "ICE" > > > Subject lines, but ignored the corresponding posts; the list archives > > > may help you. > > > > Heh. Most of those messages were probably from me desperately seeking > > assistance of any kind (quick check confirms this). :) > > Most of those older posts were concerned with people who > added -march=p4 or -march=athlon to CFLAGS. Those problems > have been fixed with the latest GCC update in the source > tree. I just tried to buildworld with gcc-3.3.1_20030804 (the one in the tree is from 20030711 I believe) installed as a package and while I did no longer receive the dreaded ICE that I'm now so familiar with, I did get the following error: In file included from /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_private.h:61, from /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_printf.c:41: /usr/src/include/stdio.h:55: warning: redefinition of `va_list' /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-portbld-freebsd5.1/3.3.1/include/stdarg.h:105: warning: `va_list' previously declared here *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib/libthr. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. I'm not sure how to fix that, but this snapshot seems to be working better despite the fact that I still can't buildworld or kernel. > > I was also wondering if there was a way to build the system with an > > older compiler (like, say, 3.1)? I had these same problems with 3.2.1 > > so I wondered if going back to an earlier version would eliminate the > > issue. > > Going backwards with the compiler probably won't help. > Have you tried installing 4.8 on this system. I still > suspect you have a hardware problem. What would that hardware problem be? This is what is driving me crazy. I'm running around beating my head against the wall trying to figure out what is wrong and no matter where I turn, I cannot get a definitive answer nor can I even find out how I might come across a definitive answer. I have not tried installing 4.8 on this system. The thought had crossed my mind, but I wanted to stay with 5.x since I've been running it since 5.0-RELEASE. Besides, if I do have a hardware problem what difference would installing 4.8 make? -Scott