Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:04:42 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, perl@freebsd.org, lth@freebsd.org, Yen-Ming Lee <leeym@leeym.com> Subject: Re: Port dependencies on p5-Test-* Message-ID: <86oda2pput.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20080227104057.GA26979@heechee.tobez.org> (Anton Berezin's message of "Wed\, 27 Feb 2008 11\:40\:57 %2B0100") References: <868x19i6ky.fsf@ds4.des.no> <759236930802251702h694c4f5bn2c7c87c7c47c7cc@mail.gmail.com> <20080226122512.GA30778@heechee.tobez.org> <86ve4bsx8l.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080226140456.GB30778@heechee.tobez.org> <867igrst0g.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080226144203.GC30778@heechee.tobez.org> <86mypnrary.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080226161635.GE30778@heechee.tobez.org> <86ejayr969.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080227104057.GA26979@heechee.tobez.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> writes: > We are arguing about a relatively minor thing here, namely about whether = to > keep the knowledge about dual-life modules in bsd.perl.mk or try to deduce > it in runtime (and by proxy, whether to use the existing *package* version > check or to do perl *module* version check), not about the usefulness of = the > suggested knobs, remember? OK, we can hash out the details at the Hackathon. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86oda2pput.fsf>