From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 23:43:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C902D16A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 23:43:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E1243D54 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 23:43:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lgrady@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so33387rne for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 15:43:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=isepf9Y/A2ENsqrX3y4wQ6B/16E3mjZys/ICtiUSuY7CbVjWnwQhFFSbnWX/ybBKJhkQIWp6nAaHphHNTsT3F/aEbYq6fYb852eUx2SoHViCJHoDad0hO6V/wJoqfB+mZwHP7jInQNNT32ahOPC906JGHdmbsOZn3FJKiv9xRlM= Received: by 10.38.165.7 with SMTP id n7mr648535rne; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 15:43:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.22.44 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:43:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5fee5e3004110215435b32188e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:43:35 -0600 From: luke To: Tim Aslat In-Reply-To: <20041102125217.3b188300@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041101003519.GI6513@alzatex.com> <1099256318.18712.10.camel@ocean-deep.gldis.ca> <200411010733240766.19A04B72@mail.intradyn.com> <200411020215.28711.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <20041102125217.3b188300@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is my computer under spec? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: luke List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 23:43:49 -0000 > I've managed to use PC133 ram in an older system with no problems, > except I couldn't mix'n'match with the PC100 ram that was already in > there as it caused some interesting instabilities. pc133 will clock down with no instability if both chips are of decent manufacture(kingston, micron, samsung) you can get into problems if you're trying to run pc100 at 133 but even then if you use corsair or mushkin, which are designed to be overclocked you can get by. i have many systems that are thrown together running a mix of pc100, 133, and even ecc 133 and they all run stable, although i'm not overclocking any of the 100, just underclocking the 133(and of course, not using ecc)