From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar  5 15:19:03 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758)
	id 0F06016A4CF; Sat,  5 Mar 2005 15:19:03 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:19:03 +0000
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@neva.vlink.ru>
Message-ID: <20050305151903.GC26240@hub.freebsd.org>
References: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
	<41C26F23F7DF023CB3DF35C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
	<87sm3ajj8s.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87sm3ajj8s.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc>
Subject: Re: unionfs 5.4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 15:19:03 -0000

On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 04:49:07PM +0300, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:
> >>>>> "Mathieu" == Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> writes:
> 
>  Mathieu> I'm not answering to your question, but what's the need of a
>  Mathieu> ro unionfs, a ro nullfs would do the same, no ?
> 
> It seems that nullfs much slower.

But it works, and doesn't panic the system.  unionfs is
well-documented to be broken, and this is unlikely to change in the
near future.

Kris