Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:08:11 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219699] Issue with IPv6 and neighbor notification Message-ID: <bug-219699-2472-fNr7VbjARw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-219699-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-219699-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219699 --- Comment #9 from rkoberman@gmail.com --- (In reply to Paul G Webster from comment #8) That would explain it. I am very surprised that Linux does not use the link-local address for routing information. That was one of the main reason= for the link-local implementation in IPv6. Can someone confirm that Linux does not use link-local as the default NDP communication connection? Yes, ebtables (on linux) should always allow link-local. No, all routing is= not over link-local. Protocols that communicate to non-adjacent nodes (e.g. BGP) cannot use link-local. Glad you tracked this down. You saved the next guy problems. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-219699-2472-fNr7VbjARw>