From owner-freebsd-security Tue May 4 21: 2:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from narcissus.net (narcissus.net [209.73.230.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349B415810 for ; Tue, 4 May 1999 21:02:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@narcissus.net) Received: by narcissus.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 18AF816D; Tue, 4 May 1999 23:53:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by narcissus.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AA3016B; Tue, 4 May 1999 23:53:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 23:53:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Snob Art Genre To: Darren Reed Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , dillon@apollo.backplane.com, des@ifi.uio.no, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Jamie Rishaw ] FreeBSD 3.1 remote reboot exploit In-Reply-To: <199905050257.MAA07852@cheops.anu.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 5 May 1999, Darren Reed wrote: > So at this point, are you or one of the other freebsd people going to > post a reply to bugtraq requesting more information and/or denying that > it is a problem until it can be proved more conclusively ? Being on the > cusp of a release & Usenix, this needs to be settled one way or another. If the fellow's moving, as someone posted, then there won't likely be any responses forthcoming from him just yet, and he has been mailed privately -- but it seems to me that a followup post from someone official- ish might be good for PR reasons. Ben @narcissus.net -- finally To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message