From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 7 18:06:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E1316A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 18:06:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.fillmore-labs.com (lima.fillmore-labs.com [62.138.193.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D3D43FCB for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 18:06:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from p5080b418.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.128.180.24] helo=fillmore-labs.com ident=qv764u312ih7oe5w) by mx2.fillmore-labs.com with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AIIUq-000FzJ-4j; Sat, 08 Nov 2003 03:06:40 +0100 Message-ID: <3FAC4FA7.5040206@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 03:06:31 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <200311071800.hA7I0gnW006483@freefall.freebsd.org> <63CF9A6D-114E-11D8-AD24-003065ABFD92@pkix.net> In-Reply-To: <63CF9A6D-114E-11D8-AD24-003065ABFD92@pkix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH X-Complaints-To: abuse@fillmore-labs.com cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfiles: sysutils/clean_ X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 02:06:43 -0000 Hi Chuck, > On Nov 7, 2003, at 1:00 PM, Bill "distfiles" Fenner wrote: > >> Dear chuck@pkix.net, >> >> You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port >> whose distfiles [or main web pages] are not fetchable from their >> MASTER_SITES. Could you please visit >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/chuck@pkix.net.html >> >> and correct the problems listed there? The individual port with >> a problem is sysutils/clean_. > > > Hi, all-- > > To recap: the port as submitted works fine, but the name 'clean' broke > the generation of the ports INDEX. I believe the port was renamed in > CVS via a repocopy to 'clean_', while Oliver Eikemeier kindly looked > into and produced a patch to bsd.port.subdir.mk which seemed to resolve > the bug with generating INDEX. > > What I should do next to address Bill Fenner's scripted email...? :-) You have three possibilities, listed in order of (my personal) preference: 1.) You could revive sysutils/clean, it should work now (PR 57438 is committed) 2.) You could name your port clean instead of clean_ 3.) You could use clean instead of ${PORTNAME} for MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR