From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 10 21:27:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F256816A4CE; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:26:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9192743D2F; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:26:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAALTWwl061063; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:29:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <419287DA.7030205@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:27:54 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Marcus Clarke References: <1100120495.36242.15.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <1100120495.36242.15.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6-CURRENT unbelievably slow? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:27:00 -0000 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > I've been using -CURRENT for a long time now (from early 5.X up to 6.X), > and even with WITNESS and INVARIANTS things didn't seem this slow. I > have a P4 2.4 GHz machine with 2 GB of RAM running a very recent > 6-CURRENT: > > FreeBSD fugu.marcuscom.com 6.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #11: Wed Nov > 10 01:03:33 EST 2004 > gnome@fugu.marcuscom.com:/space2/obj/usr/src/sys/FUGU i386 > > (The version prior to this from October 14 was fine), and it takes > around _8 hours_ to do a make world (this is my GNOME Tinderbox > machine). The disk on which the build is taking place is an SATA-150 > drive, and the system drive is a U320 SCSI disk on an mpt controller. > There is nothing else happening on this system while it builds, and the > build is happening normally (i.e. not through NFS, nullfs, etc.). > > Attached are my dmesg and my kernel config. Nothing has changed > configuration or hardware wise between when performance was good > (October 14 build) and now (November 10 build). I have userland malloc > debugging disabled with /etc/malloc.conf -> ajH. > > Any help would be most appreciated since I'd like to kick out a new > batch of GNOME packages. Thanks. > Nothing has happened recently that I would suspect. The only reasonable idea I can come up with is the recent HZ change. Can you try backing that down to 100? Scott