From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 18:00:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC73C1065677 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F878FC19 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1LAppd-000K1u-7h; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:00:13 +0300 To: Marcel Moolenaar References: <92804393@bb.ipt.ru> <26722819@bb.ipt.ru> <26719629@bb.ipt.ru> <19F75E66-0535-4982-9726-E2C0A03117EA@mac.com> <94541668@bb.ipt.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:00:12 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Marcel Moolenaar's message of "Thu\, 11 Dec 2008 09\:06\:56 -0800") Message-ID: <48144979@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru Subject: Re: Timeda 8-multiport adapter: only 2 ports available X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:00:14 -0000 Marcel Moolenaar writes: > Summary: > > port 1: IO=0xec00; IIR=0x1, 0xc1; MCR=0x0, 0x8 > port 2: IO=0xec08; IIR=0x1, 0xc1; MCR=0x0, 0x8 > port 3: IO=0xe880; IIR=0x1; MCR=0x40 > port 4: IO=0xe888; IIR=0x1; MCR=0x40 > port 5: IO=0xe800; IIR=0x1; MCR=0x40 > port 6: IO=0xe480; IIR=0x1; MCR=0x40 > port 7: IO=0xe400; IIR=0x1; MCR=0x40 > port 8: IO=0xe080; IIR=0x1; MCR=0x40 > > For ports 3-8, the MCR has a value that's not liked by > uart(4). I think we need to know what that value means. > Are the ports disabled? Are they in a non-standard > mode? Is it just a non-standard status bit that's set > and we should ignore it? etc... > > Boris: can you apply the following patch and see if > uart(4) attaches to all ports? If yes, can you see > if those ports actually work as well? All ports were attached. But ports 3-8 don't work as axpected. I see garbage when connecting via those ports. BTW, I'm not sure if it may help, but FYI: the card is made of two different chip types: SUN1889 (1-2 ports) and SUN1699 (3-8 ports). Thanks! WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve