Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:08:19 -0400 From: Frank Laszlo <laszlof@vonostingroup.com> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tomcat55 port on AMD64 Message-ID: <44636F83.8020103@vonostingroup.com> In-Reply-To: <39169750@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <00bd01c6750a$b7c631e0$0a1610ac@prodcave.com> <4463603F.3050600@vonostingroup.com> <39169750@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Thu, 11 May 2006 12:03:11 -0400 Frank Laszlo wrote: > > >> I submitted a patch[1] to fix this issue some time ago, It has to do >> with the way linux ports handle ARCH, since the linux emulation port >> doesn't work on amd64, its forced to use i386 rpm's. Unfortunately my >> efforts were shun by a brick wall, and no changes were made to address >> this. I am going to repeat this one more time, ARCH should NEVER be >> overwritten, here is yet another example of why. >> > > >> [1]http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/91911 >> > > Seems that this problem shouldn't exist since updating of the port to > use new bsd.linux-rpm.mk. > > > WBR > You would think so, but the fact of the matter is, ARCH should be a READONLY variable. It is relied upon heavily in the ports framework and shouldn't be changed, ever. Why we don't just use another variable name to do the trickery is what I am wondering. __________________________________________________ Frank Laszlo System Administrator The VonOstin Group Email: laszlof@tvog.net WWW: http://www.vonostingroup.com Mobile: 248-863-7584
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44636F83.8020103>