From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 22 21:55:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475AF106566C for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:55:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32118FC14 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NNChX-0000Fy-VK for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:55:32 +0100 Received: from CPE00134609fbfb-CM0013718690da.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([99.226.150.73]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:55:31 +0100 Received: from jasonspiro4 by CPE00134609fbfb-CM0013718690da.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:55:31 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Jason Spiro Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <200912221725.40074.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 99.226.150.73 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.13) Gecko/2009080717 Firefox/3.0.13) Sender: news Subject: Re: Suggestion: rename "killall" to "fkill", but wait five years to phase the new name in X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:55:35 -0000 Daniel O'Connor gsoft.com.au> writes: > > Why not get Sun and HP to change killall to match Linux & *BSD > behaviour? > > > Although seriously, why not? killall just killing everything is a fairly > dangerous command with almost no use in the real world. Because I find that when I send feedback to closed-source software vendors, I often get no reply at all. But if any of you want to file an OpenSolaris bug or write to HP or any other of the Unix vendors who ship a dangerous killall command (I think most do), feel free. Please let us know that you've done so, to help us avoid duplication.