Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 May 2001 01:46:49 +0200
From:      Ernst de Haan <ernst@jollem.com>
To:        Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre-lists@noos.fr>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ports/27748: Update port: java/orion (1.4.5_4 -> 1.4.5_5)
Message-ID:  <20010531014649.C3352@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl>
In-Reply-To: <200105301210.f4UCA3x57896@freefall.freebsd.org>; from clefevre-lists@noos.fr on Wed, May 30, 2001 at 05:10:03AM -0700
References:  <200105301210.f4UCA3x57896@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cyrille,

>  As I told you messages <vgmluu39.fsf@gits.dyndns.org> and
>  <200105290016.f4T0GbU72454@gits.dyndns.org> in -ports, this
>  pkg-deinstall script isn't needed since it could be done as a one
>  liner to the beginning of pkg-plist such as :
>  
>  @unexec [ -e /var/run/orion.pid ] && { echo killing orion.; kill `cat /var/run/orion.pid`; echo remoing pid file.; rm -f /var/run/orion.pid; }
>  
>  I just wanted this noted in gnats. the commiter will decide :P

I know. Any comments? I prefer the more verbose and flexible approach of the
pkg-deinstall file. But on the other hand I share the concern wrt inode usage.

You know what? Why not remove the java/jpda port, as I requested in my mail to
ports@freebsd.org, (Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 14:24:39 +0200). That would make a
bigger difference. Hmm, I should have sent a PR instead at the time...

Ernst

-- 
Ernst de Haan
Java Architect
Jollem Information Technology

    "Come to me all who are weary and burdened
        and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010531014649.C3352>