Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:11:04 -0400 From: Anish Mistry <mistry.7@osu.edu> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@bfoz.net> Subject: Re: SMP support maturity? AMD64x2 or FX-57? Message-ID: <200507221711.12690.mistry.7@osu.edu> In-Reply-To: <42E151B4.7030500@bfoz.net> References: <42E151B4.7030500@bfoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1492933.Dykjf673B7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 22 July 2005 04:06 pm, Brandon Fosdick wrote: > SMP support in FreeBSD seems to be a perpetually favorite feature > to gripe about, but every release seems to say that its getting > better. I'm about to build a new server and am trying to determine > if I should go with dual procs or just a single. The AMD64x2 is > slightly cheaper than the FX-57 so I'm leaning that way, but it > would be a rather pointless savings if SMP isn't well supported. > > So, is SMP in -STABLE ready for primetime? Can it really make use > of two processors? _______________________________________________ I'm running RELENG_6 on a dual processor Opteron in 64 bit mode and=20 it's working fine as long as I'm using the 4BSD scheduler. =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --nextPart1492933.Dykjf673B7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC4WDwxqA5ziudZT0RAtEXAJ9Ma05EFPFrmZsSlPZao90goNHHVwCgu6Vn o031UtVuktPhyAoIrM+/zQY= =t0+3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1492933.Dykjf673B7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200507221711.12690.mistry.7>