From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 30 15:16:28 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A3C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:16:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from yearning.mcc.ac.uk (yearning.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.203.23])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB4143D3F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:16:27 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org)
Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97])
	by yearning.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD))
	id 1CZ98B-000BKO-RH; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:37:27 +0000
Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	iAUEbMlZ029780;	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:37:27 GMT
	(envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org)
Received: (from jcm@localhost)
	by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.12.10/8.12.6/Submit) id iAUEbMUN029779;
	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:37:22 GMT
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:37:21 +0000
From: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>
To: Ruben de Groot <mail25@bzerk.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20041130143721.GA29674@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
References: <20041127215612.GA86416@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
	<20041128013135.GD662@gothmog.gr>
	<20041128044847.GA1435@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
	<20041128122741.GB43088@gothmog.gr> <20041129113020.GA72673@ei.bzerk.org>
	<20041129132114.GA66047@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
	<20041129140930.GA73929@ei.bzerk.org>
	<20041129144458.GA69798@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
	<20041129151407.GA74785@ei.bzerk.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041129151407.GA74785@ei.bzerk.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Subject: Re: Is this a hole in my firewall?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:16:28 -0000

On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 04:14:07PM +0100, Ruben de Groot wrote:
: > : allow ip from ${INTERNAL_NET} to any keep-state out xmit tun0
: > : 
: > : where INTERNAL_NET would be e.g. 192.168.0.0/24

I was checking out the man page, and I'm a little unclear on whether I want
'xmit' or 'via' in this rule.  Does it make much of a practical difference?


jm
--