Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:37:21 +0000 From: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: Ruben de Groot <mail25@bzerk.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is this a hole in my firewall? Message-ID: <20041130143721.GA29674@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20041129151407.GA74785@ei.bzerk.org> References: <20041127215612.GA86416@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20041128013135.GD662@gothmog.gr> <20041128044847.GA1435@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20041128122741.GB43088@gothmog.gr> <20041129113020.GA72673@ei.bzerk.org> <20041129132114.GA66047@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20041129140930.GA73929@ei.bzerk.org> <20041129144458.GA69798@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20041129151407.GA74785@ei.bzerk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 04:14:07PM +0100, Ruben de Groot wrote:
: > : allow ip from ${INTERNAL_NET} to any keep-state out xmit tun0
: > :
: > : where INTERNAL_NET would be e.g. 192.168.0.0/24
I was checking out the man page, and I'm a little unclear on whether I want
'xmit' or 'via' in this rule. Does it make much of a practical difference?
jm
--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041130143721.GA29674>