Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 17:19:03 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Subject: Re: SMP discussion moving to freebsd-smp Message-ID: <200006202319.RAA75806@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:07:34 PDT." <200006202307.QAA89367@apollo.backplane.com> References: <200006202307.QAA89367@apollo.backplane.com> <200006201936.MAA88247@apollo.backplane.com> <200006201708.KAA87060@apollo.backplane.com> <200006201844.MAA70842@harmony.village.org> <200006201950.NAA71778@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200006202307.QAA89367@apollo.backplane.com> Matthew Dillon writes: : Hmm. I think from the point of view of pccard development you : will be in good shape. I can't really guess what the level of : instability will be, but I think if we test things enough before : committing (i.e. the machine has to survive a 'make' of the kernel) : that it should be good enough to not intefere too much with your : pccard work. I can accept that level of testing. You build the kernel, reboot and rebuild the kernel and if that succeeds, you can commit it. For most of the changes that the SMP work will be doing, this will be acceptible, to my way of seeing it. This is certainly much less severe than the original message suggested. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006202319.RAA75806>