From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Mar 22 10:00:06 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA18172
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 10:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA18154;
          Sat, 22 Mar 1997 10:00:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 10:00:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199703221800.KAA18154@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports
Cc: 
From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Subject: Re: ports/3038: Update xperfmon++ port in current
Reply-To: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR ports/3038; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
To: lkoeller@odie.physik2.uni-rostock.de
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/3038: Update xperfmon++ port in current
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 18:20:54 +0100

 As Lars Koeller wrote:
 
 > Please update the xperfmon++-1.33 port/package in
 > port/packages-current. Or did it not compile/run?
 
 Huh?
 
 Ports don't have version tags.  FreeBSD 2.2's ports are simply a
 snapshot of the ports collection by the time the release has been
 done, so the xperfmon port _is_ the updated one.
 
 -- 
 cheers, J"org
 
 joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
 Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)