From owner-cvs-all Fri Dec 1 12:30: 9 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD67B37B400; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 12:30:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7D4311AC4; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:30:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:30:04 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: John Baldwin , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/linux/linprocfs linprocfs_misc.c Message-ID: <20001201153004.T559@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , John Baldwin , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200012010634.eB16YKD44700@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from des@ofug.org on Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:21:24PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:21:24PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > This code has a maintainer. I also "maintain" make(1) but people are free to commit to it where appropriate. Same thing for any of my ports and addport as well. You need to stop being so damn pedantic about that bit. If every maintainer of the ports tree got up in tight panties about their ports being touched during DISTNAME->PORTNAME/VERSION and other various changes that modified *every single port in the tree*, why, we'd be in bloody hell by now. The point is, private email would accomplish a lot more in your favor, like respect for your code. I think we've discussed this stuff on the lists more than enough in the past, to be quite honest. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message