From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 9 20:32:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4571065692; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:32:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC2F8FC17; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0F4646B2E; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:32:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 007C78A024; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:32:05 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Andrew Pantyukhin Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:20:21 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-CBSD-20091103; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: <20091208060339.GK98273@pollux.cenkes.org> <200912091002.55490.jhb@freebsd.org> <20091209184345.GR98273@pollux.cenkes.org> In-Reply-To: <20091209184345.GR98273@pollux.cenkes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200912091520.21583.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:32:05 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libi386/biosacpi.c - bad RSDP checksum search X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:32:06 -0000 On Wednesday 09 December 2009 1:43:45 pm Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:02:55AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > We can probably just drop the message altogether I think. The > > ACPI stuff the loader does is just advisory. The kernel will > > give more detailed notes about a bad checksum if needed. > > Agreed, looks like a leftover debug message. Can you commit if > there's no objection? Oh, I was going to let you commit it. If you would rather I do it that is fine as well. -- John Baldwin