From owner-freebsd-security  Sat Aug  9 08:33:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA28409
          for security-outgoing; Sat, 9 Aug 1997 08:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhf.wdc.net (uhf.4d.net [207.137.157.140])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA28403;
          Sat, 9 Aug 1997 08:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (bad@localhost) by uhf.wdc.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA00625; Sat, 9 Aug 1997 11:36:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 11:36:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bernie Doehner <bad@uhf.wireless.net>
X-Sender: bad@uhf.wdc.net
To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: "Jonathan A. Zdziarski" <jonz@netrail.net>, zoonie <zoonie@myhouse.com>,
        isp@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: SKIP & freebsd 2.2.2 
In-Reply-To: <28884.871137903@orion.webspan.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970809113441.563D-100000@uhf.wdc.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> It's basically a reduced but freely redistributable implimentation (if
> you live in the US or Canada) of part of SMIs SunScreen encrypted
> tunnel product. I've got a version that compiles and will be sending
> it out for testing to someone this week.
> 

I didn't see anything in the docs suggesting that it is only for
tunneling.

Yes, we'd be interested in hearing about your compilation attempts on
skip. Can you please send us a unified diff reflecting the changes you had
to make.

Thanks.

Bernie