From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 4 15:31:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AC416A40F for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-227-250.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EA513C448 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l04FUnbH034407; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 09:30:49 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070104092952.024aa4f8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 09:30:40 -0600 To: "Alex Teslik" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: References: <6.0.0.22.2.20070103165658.024fd900@mail.computinginnovations.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: DNS propagation problems - changed ip X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:31:22 -0000 Alex, You are very welcome. Now that you are an expert, be sure to help the next guy out. -Derek At 11:26 PM 1/3/2007, Alex Teslik wrote: >Hi Derek, > > Thank you very much. Sure enough, a call to the registrar and the ips >finally became updated - seconds later everything started pouring in. Whew! > I misunderstood DNS in this scenario. My understanding was that an update >of the DNS broadcast from my server would automatically update everything >out there. I suppose now that I think about it more a manual update to the >*authoritative* nameserver seems reasonable. I noticed that >non-authoritative nameservers for the other domains I host automatically >snapped into place once the authoritative one got back in line. > Thanks again! > > >On 1/3/07, Derek Ragona wrote: >> >> Your registrar for the domain maintains actual IP's for your >>authoritative DNS servers. If you moved those from one IP to another, >>update the registrars record to reflect the new addresses. >> >> -Derek >> >> >>At 10:30 AM 1/3/2007, Alex Teslik wrote: >> >>Hello, >> >> I changed the ip address of my server (physical move to a new location) >>and updated my dns. Logs show that everything is fine. I can get out to >>other sites just fine, send email, and internally everything is working >>fine. However, I updated on Jan 1st and the changes for the nameservers >>have >>still not propagated out anywhere. Logs show no one hitting the server. >>I'm >>starting to get worried. >> The db file has this data: >> >> 2007010101 ; Serial (year,month,day,version_that_day) >> 86400 ; refresh (1 day) >> 7200 ; retry (2 hours) >> 8640000 ; expire (100 days) >> 86400 ) ; minimum (1 day) >> >>So after 1 day external DNS's should update to the new info. >> The only other bit of info that I can't figure out is that in the logs >>I'm getting this message: >> >>Jan 2 02:44:16 gouda /kernel: arplookup 10.1.10.1 failed: host is not on >>local network >> >>but 10.1.10.1 has nothing to do with my network, so I have no idea which >>service is trying to get to this. I grepped all etc and usr/local/etc bu >>nothing have that ip. >> >>Finally, nslookup is working on any address including my own. Thats makes >>me >>think DNS is working properly... Any ideas on what else I can check that >>might not be right? >> >>Thanks >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >>-- >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>believed to be clean. >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. >> >> >>-- >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >>dangerous content by *MailScanner* , and is >>believed to be clean. >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for >>their support. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.